Workshop results

S. Songsakulkiat and P. Ruchikachorn, β€œFamiliarity vs. Correctness: Arcs and Angles in Sunburst Charts,” PacificVis 2021 Posters, Tianjin, China, 19-22 April 2021.

πŸ–Ό Poster

πŸ“„ Preprint

A Sunburst chart visualizes hierarchical data as concentric rings. Similar to a pie chart, a Sunburst chart may be read through arc lengths or sector angles, but its multilevel nature makes arc lengths across levels unreliable as a visual variable. In this study, we designed Sunburst chart variations to test whether they affect chart reading performance. We found that the participants used arc lengths to read chart values, confirming a previous study. Other factors in the experiment suggested that the values in focus should be placed in adjacent layers and in quadrant III and IV as the participants tended to correctly read data values through angles instead.


Screenshot on Diabetes

P. Ruchikachorn and P. Rattanawicha, β€œAn Eye-Tracking Study on Sparklines within Textual Context,” EuroVis 2018 Posters, Brno, Czech Republic, 4-8 June 2018.

πŸ“Š Slides

πŸ–Ό Poster

πŸ“„ Stimuli

πŸ“„ ACM or Preprint

Sparklines are placed in documents but their usability is rarely evaluated in their immediate context of paragraphs of text. We conducted an eye-tracking study to measure readability and understandability of four different conditions: two different sparkline chart types (bar and line charts) and two text languages (native and non-native languages). We found out that most participants out of 296 in total were not distracted by sparklines. Only 3.19% of the average reading time was spent looking at sparklines. There was no correlation between dwell time and data understanding, measured in a post-experiment quiz. The chart types did not have a significant effect on sparkline attention. However, compared with native textual context, sparklines in non-native text were more noticeable. The results of this study can be useful for future sparkline usage consideration.